[Webinar] Reiwa June 4, 6th Amendment Public Interest Whistleblower Protection Law Enforcement-Pitts and Points to Note in Enforcement-Part 1
2022/ 7/ 25
[Webinar] Discovery Procedures for International Arbitration-Notes on Concluding Contracts and After Proceeding Arbitration-Part 1
2022/ 7/ 29
April 2022, 6 Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Law Office / FRONTEO co-sponsored
[After logging in, you can download the materials for the seminar held on October 6. ]
Points of attendance
There are many differences between international arbitration and Japanese trials, but one of the major differences is discovery. In general, much wider discovery is allowed compared to Japanese trials, which is one of the important points in deciding the outcome of arbitration proceedings. In addition, the time and cost burden tends to be heavy due to the discovery procedure, so it is necessary to proceed systematically and efficiently.
In this video, first, the mechanism of evidence disclosure in international arbitration is concretely explained, and then the methods to control the scope of evidence disclosure (responses in arbitration clauses, responses after arbitration is filed) and issues that are often problematic in the disclosure of evidence in arbitration are explained.
【Program】
(1) Outline of discovery procedure in international arbitration
(2) Usefulness of discovery (how to request effective discovery)
(3) Control of the scope of discovery (arbitration agreement, agreement on procedures after arbitration is filed)
(4) Evidence preservation and review (document preservation method / review)
(5) Reason for refusal of disclosure (trade secret / lawyer confidentiality privilege)
Only members can watch it.
Please refrain from registering at a law firm, in the same industry as our company, or with a free email address.
April 2022, 6 Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Law Office / FRONTEO co-sponsored
[The materials for this seminar can be downloaded from the form below.]
Points of attendance
There are many differences between international arbitration and Japanese trials, but one of the major differences is discovery. In general, much wider discovery is allowed compared to Japanese trials, which is one of the important points in deciding the outcome of arbitration proceedings. In addition, the time and cost burden tends to be heavy due to the discovery procedure, so it is necessary to proceed systematically and efficiently.
In this video, first, the mechanism of evidence disclosure in international arbitration is concretely explained, and then the methods to control the scope of evidence disclosure (responses in arbitration clauses, responses after arbitration is filed) and issues that are often problematic in the disclosure of evidence in arbitration are explained.
【Program】
(1) Outline of discovery procedure in international arbitration
(2) Usefulness of discovery (how to request effective discovery)
(3) Control of the scope of discovery (arbitration agreement, agreement on procedures after arbitration is filed)
(4) Evidence preservation and review (document preservation method / review)
(5) Reason for refusal of disclosure (trade secret / lawyer confidentiality privilege)
Lecturer
Nagashima / Ohno / Tsunematsu Law Office Associate Takashi Ohno
As a civil and criminal judge, he has experienced many complicated inter-company disputes, pharmaceutical proceedings, medical disputes, etc.
Since becoming a lawyer from 2018, he has been involved in international arbitration proceedings (construction, pharmaceutical affairs, etc.), cross-border disputes (class action proceedings in the United States, etc.), domestic proceedings, misconduct / crisis management, construction / healthcare-related contract negotiations, etc. Handles general corporate legal affairs.
Japanese Law Part of GAR Know How-Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards (Law Business Research, May 2022, co-authored)
Global Arbitration Review -The Guide to Challenging Arbitration Awarads- Second Edition Part II Japanese Law Part (Law Business Research, May 2021, co-authored)
Underwriters' liability for false statements made in IPO (Law Business Research, June 2021, co-authored)
Profile
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Law Office is one of Japan's leading comprehensive law firms with more than 500 lawyers, and has offices in Tokyo, New York, Singapore, Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh, Hanoi and Shanghai.We provide one-stop legal services in all fields of corporate legal affairs, and have a wealth of experience and achievements in both domestic and international projects.
Download materials / contact us
You can download or contact us from here.
Please select a category, enter the required items, and press the send button.
